Demonstrators gathered Thursday morning to protest Trump’s proposed arch, which would stand in a traffic circle on the bridge connecting the National Mall to Arlington National Cemetery.
Saul Loeb/AFP
Saul Loeb/AFP
In the heart of Washington, D.C., protesters have taken a stand against a towering structure proposed by President Trump. The 250-foot-tall arch, slated to be erected at Memorial Circle, has drawn criticism for its size and cost, as well as its proximity to Arlington National Cemetery.
Activists, including veterans and lawmakers, gathered with a tarp mockup to emphasize the arch’s intended height, which would be 32 times taller. Concerns over its lack of Congressional approval and the negative impact on Arlington’s sacred grounds were echoed by many, including those involved in a lawsuit against the project.
Jon Gundersen, a retired Army veteran, expressed strong opposition, stating, “It’s the wrong monument, in the wrong place, at the wrong time, dedicated to the wrong man.” His remarks were part of a larger protest organized by Public Citizen, which is leading legal action against the arch.
Gundersen highlighted bipartisan disapproval of the arch, noting, “Anyone I talk to, whether Republican or Democrat, they say it’s a waste of money and it’s not how you honor vets.”
The controversy centers on the arch’s potential impact on Arlington National Cemetery, with many arguing that the funds could be better used to improve veteran services. Senator Tammy Duckworth voiced her anger, questioning the appropriateness of the monument near hallowed grounds.
Despite assurances from the White House that the arch will enhance the visitor experience, concerns remain, particularly regarding aviation safety and the proposed use of the arch for military purposes. Critics argue that the structure’s location near a busy airport runway poses additional challenges.
Chisels and votes: How critics are fighting the arch
As the project advances, opponents are exploring various strategies to halt its progress. The National Capital Planning Commission is set to review the proposal soon, with discussions around minimizing harm to nearby historic sites ongoing.
Recent developments have seen the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation end its review process, a move criticized by preservationists like Charles Birnbaum of The Cultural Landscape Foundation. He expressed concern over the lack of stakeholder engagement in the decision-making process.
With federal approval looming, protesters continue to advocate for legislative intervention. Efforts to block funding have faced challenges, but the possibility remains that a shift in Congressional power could alter the project’s fate.
As debate continues, activists vow to oppose the arch’s construction, with some prepared to take drastic measures if the project proceeds. “We have to continue to call in to our senators, our congresspeople, and let them say no to this arc,” urged Julius D. “JD” Spain Sr. of the Arlington County Board, emphasizing the widespread resistance to the proposal.
